cost contributions claimed in a rule 43 application

The essential basis of the claim is the reciprocal duty of support between spouses, which includes the cost of legal proceedings.

When assessing a spouse’s reasonable litigation needs, a court will have regard to what is involved in the case, the scale on which the parties are litigating, or intend to litigate, and the parties’ respective means. The legal rules relating to the reciprocal duty of support between spouses are gender neutral, so that an indigent husband may claim support from an affluent wife. But the reality must be acknowledged that, given traditional child-care roles and the wealth disparity between men and women, it has normally been women who have had to approach the courts  for  a contribution  towards  costs  in  divorce litigation.

The right to dignity is impacted when a spouse is robbed  of the necessary means to litigate. 

The main duty of support is owed between  spouses, and a wife who is lacking means should be entitled to look to the husband, if he has sufficient means, to fund her  reasonable  litigation  costs.  (The same  of course  applies  if the  husband  is indigent and the wife affluent). And where  an impecunious spouse  has  already incurred  debts in  order to litigate,  whether  to family or to an attorney,  a court should protect the dignity of that spouse by ordering  a contribution to costs sufficient to repay those debts (at least to the extent that the court considers the expenditure reasonable).

For direct answers to your specific personal questions, please contact us directly.

Read more about our family law services.

Author – Jessica Gooding

More Posts