Moving Away vs. Moving On: The Legal Realities of Relocating with Children

Legal Realities of Relocating with Children

For the average person, relocating to another country for a job opportunity would be a dream come true. In a globalised economy, a promotion in London, a partnership in Dubai, or a new venture in New York is not just a career milestone; it is a life-altering opportunity.

But when that opportunity involves moving your children across international borders, the dream of moving on can quickly collide with the complex legal realities of relocation, particularly when the co-parent does not consent.

At BA Attorneys, we specialise in high-stakes relocation litigation. Relocation is not simply about packing suitcases; it requires careful navigation of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention, and the rigorous scrutiny of the High Court.

The Relocation Paradox: Opportunity vs. Obstruction

Relocation applications are among the most emotionally charged and legally complex disputes in family law. Unlike a maintenance dispute, relocation is often all-or-nothing. One parent sees this opportunity as an advancement, while the other sees the erosion of a meaningful relationship with their child.

If you are planning to relocate, or opposing a relocation, you are entering a highly specialised area of cross-border litigation where a single misstep can result in a finding of international child abduction.

Understanding Section 18 of the Children’s Act

Under South African law, specifically Section 18 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, both parents typically hold full parental responsibilities and rights. This includes the right to consent to, or refuse, the removal of a child from South Africa.

As a general rule, a child may not be removed from the Republic without:

1. The written consent of the other parent, or

2. An Order of the High Court

Removing a child without either constitutes wrongful removal and may trigger serious international legal consequences. 

When Temporary”Becomes Wrongful: A Cautionary Reality

Recent High Court matters have demonstrated how quickly a temporary arrangement can escalate into international litigation.

Should a child be kept in South Africa for a longer period than was mutually agreed upon, a court may determine that the child’s habitual residence is in a different country and subsequently mandate their immediate return.

The key takeaway is this: 

Good intentions do not protect you, but legal compliance does.

The Strategic Pivot: Building a Relocation Case

Where consent is refused, the only available route is a Relocation High Court Application. This is a fully fledged litigation process requiring a detailed evidentiary foundation. 

A central and often decisive component of any relocation application is the involvement of a forensic clinical psychologist. A properly conducted forensic assessment provides the Court with an independent, clinically grounded evaluation of:

  • The child’s emotional attachments.
  • The family dynamic.
  • The psychological impact of relocation.

In contested matters, this evidence often carries significant weight in determining the outcome.

1. The “Bona Fides” of the Move

The Court will interrogate the motive behind the relocation.

The relocating parent must demonstrate that the move is genuine, well considered, and supported by:

  • Proof of a confirmed employment opportunity.
  • Financial sustainability
  • Clear planning for relocation.

Where motives are challenged, a forensic clinical psychologist may assess whether the relocation aligns with the child’s emotional and developmental needs.

2. The Proposed Living Environment

The Court requires a clear and detailed picture of the child’s future life.

Appropriate Housing

  • Accommodation.
  • Confirmed residence.
  • Stability and safety.

Schooling

  • Identified school.
  • Admission confirmation, where possible.
  • Curriculum and opportunities.
  • Comparison with current schooling in South Africa.

Lifestyle and Environment

  • Community integration.
  • Support structures.
  • Cultural and social environment.

Without this level of detail, a relocation application is fundamentally weakened.

3. The Impact on the Left-Behind Parent

This is often the most decisive issue. The relocating parent must present a structured and actionable plan to preserve the child’s relationship with the parent remaining in SA.

This includes

  • Scheduled virtual contact
  • Defined holiday arrangements
  • Travel logistics and cost allocation

A forensic clinical psychologist is often required to assess whether the proposed arrangements are realistic and capable of sustaining a meaningful parent-child relationship.

Beyond Subjective Opinion

Relocation cases are not decided on parental narratives alone. The courts rely heavily on the evidence of forensic clinical psychologists and social workers.

These experts conduct

  • Clinical interviews
  • Parent-child interaction assessments
  • Comparative lifestyle evaluations

They provide the Court with an objective framework to determine what is in the best interests of the child. In reality, where there is a material dispute, the absence of a forensic clinical psychologist can significantly weaken a case.

The Child’s Voice

The child’s views may be considered depending on age and maturity. However, the child does not decide the outcome. A forensic clinical psychologist plays a critical role in ensuring that the child’s experience, feelings and opinions are properly elicited and contextualised without placing emotional pressure on the child.

Blended Families and Complex Family Structures

Relocation becomes significantly more complex in blended families.

These May Involve

  • Half-siblings remaining in South Africa
  • Step-parents form part of the child’s daily life
  • Multiple parenting arrangements across households

Relocating one child may disrupt sibling relationships and destabilise an established family structure.

Courts Are Cautious If Relocation May

  • Separate siblings
  • Create unequal parenting dynamics
  • Undermine established emotional bonds

A forensic clinical psychologist is essential to assess: 

  • The impact on sibling relationships
  • The child’s integration into a new family structure abroad
  • The emotional consequences of separation

These cases require a nuanced strategy and careful evidentiary presentation.

International Legal Risks & the Hague Convention

As a signatory to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, South Africa views the removal of a child without consent or a court order as a potential wrongful removal. Similarly, keeping a child for longer than an agreed-upon period may be classified as wrongful retention.

Legal Consequences May Include

  • Immediate return orders
  • Adverse cost orders
  • International legal proceedings

Under Article 13(b), a parent may argue that returning a child would expose them to harm.

However, this defence has a high threshold and requires clear expert evidence, often from a forensic clinical psychologist.

Enforceability Across Jurisdictions 

A South African court order is not automatically enforceable in another country. While mechanisms such as mirror orders may be considered, their recognition depends entirely on the destination country’s legal framework. 

This introduces legal risk and requires careful planning, often with input from legal practitioners in the destination country.

Risks of Filing Relocation Applications Without Legal Representation

One of the most dangerous misconceptions is that a primary caregiver has the unilateral right to relocate.

This is incorrect.

Acting Without Legal Guidance Can Result In

  • Findings of wrongful removal or retention.
  • International legal proceedings.
  • Adverse costs.
  • Forced return of the child.

A critical mistake is proceeding without the involvement of a forensic clinical psychologist or without a specific sit family lawyer. Without an attorney or expert evidence, even a well-intentioned case may fail due to insufficient proof of the child’s best interests.

Why BA Attorneys?

Relocation is one of the most complex areas of family law, and requires more than a good reason.

It Requires

  • Strategic litigation planning
  • Strong evidentiary foundations
  • Expert involvement
  • A child-centred approach

At BA Attorneys, we combine legal expertise with forensic insight to ensure that every aspect of the child’s welfare is properly placed before the Court.

Contact BA Attorneys

If you are planning an international relocation or facing a dispute regarding your child’s residence, early intervention is critical. Contact BA Attorneys today to ensure your position is legally sound, strategically structured, and aligned with your child’s best interests.

Benita Ardenbaum

Director & Founder

Benita Ardenbaum is the director and founder of Benita Ardenbaum Attorneys. Benita is passionate about family law and has worked in this field for 27 years. Benita provides an integrative and client centred approach to family law. Benita’s expertise includes being able to take complex disputes, simplify them and provide a strategy to resolve them. She is a qualified mediator and has extensive experience in litigation.

Benita has an established international practice. Benita is a member of the international Academy of Family Lawyers (IAFL). Benita has extensive experience in South African and International Divorces including complex financial divorces and divorces where there are disputes relating to children.

More Posts

Divorce and New Parental Leave Laws in South Africa

Divorce and the New Parental Leave Laws in SA

South Africa’s new unified parental leave system is reshaping how caregiving is recognised during divorce. This reform affects custody, maintenance, and parenting plans, making it essential for separating parents to understand their rights and responsibilities.

Read More »